Paper detail

Computational Imaging Priors for Wireless Capsule Endoscopy: Monte Carlo-Guided Hemoglobin Mapping for Rare-Anomaly Detection

Background. RGB-trained capsule-endoscopy classifiers underperform on small-vessel vascular findings by conflating hemoglobin contrast with bile and illumination falloff. Thus, here we test whether a Monte Carlo-inspired analytic model can compute hemoglobin from RGB signal built upon extracted classifier. Methods. On Kvasir-Capsule (47,238 frames, video-level 70/15/15 split, 11 evaluable classes) we evaluate two software-only configurations against RGB-only EfficientNet-B0 across 6 seeds: (i) a prior P_blood = sigma(alpha * (H_norm - 0.5)) * Phi(r) fused as 2 zero-init auxiliary channels; (ii) a distillation head training a 3-channel RGB backbone to predict P_blood. Significance: paired DeLong, McNemar, bootstrap CIs with Bonferroni correction. Results. Across 6 seeds (n=6,423), the analytic prior provides a small but direction-consistent macro-AUC improvement: RGB-only 0.760 +/- 0.027, input-fusion 0.783 +/- 0.024 (paired Delta = +0.023, sign-positive on 5/6 seeds), distillation 0.773 +/- 0.028. The largest robust per-class lift is on Lymphangiectasia, where AUC rises from RGB 0.238 +/- 0.057 to input-fusion 0.337 +/- 0.019, sign-consistent across all 6 seeds. On rare focal-vascular classes (Angiectasia, Blood - fresh) the prior's per-seed effects are bimodal: seed=42 reaches Angiectasia AUC 0.528 -> 0.916, but the cross-seed mean is 0.646 -> 0.608 with sigma_PI = 0.23 - reported as a high-variance per-seed exemplar. Conclusion. A Monte Carlo-inspired analytic prior provides a small, direction-consistent macro-AUC improvement on Kvasir-Capsule across 6 seeds with the largest robust per-class lift on Lymphangiectasia; the distillation variant runs on plain 3-channel RGB and yields a free interpretability heatmap.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.