Paper detail

Computational generation of voids in $a$-Si and $a$-Si:H by cavitation at low density

Use of amorphous silicon ($a$-Si) and hydrogenated amorphous silicon ($a$-Si:H) in photovoltaics has been limited by light-induced degradation (the Staebler-Wronski effect) and low hole mobilities, and voids have been implicated in both problems. Accurately modeling the void microstructure is critical to theoretically understanding the cause of these issues. Previous methods of modeling voids have involved removing atoms according to an {\it a priori} idea of void structure and/or using computationally expensive molecular dynamics. We propose a new fast and unbiased approach based on the established and efficient Wooten-Winer-Weaire (WWW) Monte Carlo method, by using a range of fixed densities to generate equilibrium structures of $a$-Si and $a$-Si:H that maintain 4-coordination. We find a smooth evolution in bond lengths, bond angles, and bond angle deviations $Δθ$ as the density is changed around the equilibrium value of $4.9\times10^{22}\ $atoms/cm$^3$. However, a significant change occurs at densities below $4.3\times10^{22}\ $atoms/cm$^3$, where voids begin to form to relieve tensile stress, akin to a cavitation process in liquids. We find both small voids (radius $\sim$3 Å) and larger ones (up to 7 Å), which compare well with available experimental data. The voids have an influence on atomic structure up to 4 Åbeyond the void surface and are associated with decreasing structural order, measured by $Δθ$. We also observe an increasing medium-range dihedral order with increasing density. Our method allows fast generation of statistical ensembles, resembles a physical process during experimental deposition, and provides a set of void structures for further studies of their effects on degradation, hole mobility, two-level systems, thermal transport, and elastic properties.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.