Paper detail

Computational behavior recognition in child and adolescent psychiatry: A statistical and machine learning analysis plan

Motivation: Behavioral observations are an important resource in the study and evaluation of psychological phenomena, but it is costly, time-consuming, and susceptible to bias. Thus, we aim to automate coding of human behavior for use in psychotherapy and research with the help of artificial intelligence (AI) tools. Here, we present an analysis plan. Methods: Videos of a gold-standard semi-structured diagnostic interview of 25 youth with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and 12 youth without a psychiatric diagnosis (no-OCD) will be analyzed. Youth were between 8 and 17 years old. Features from the videos will be extracted and used to compute ratings of behavior, which will be compared to ratings of behavior produced by mental health professionals trained to use a specific behavioral coding manual. We will test the effect of OCD diagnosis on the computationally-derived behavior ratings using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). Using the generated features, a binary classification model will be built and used to classify OCD/no-OCD classes. Discussion: Here, we present a pre-defined plan for how data will be pre-processed, analyzed and presented in the publication of results and their interpretation. A challenge for the proposed study is that the AI approach will attempt to derive behavioral ratings based solely on vision, whereas humans use visual, paralinguistic and linguistic cues to rate behavior. Another challenge will be using machine learning models for body and facial movement detection trained primarily on adults and not on children. If the AI tools show promising results, this pre-registered analysis plan may help reduce interpretation bias. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov - H-18010607

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.