Paper detail

Computational Auditory Periphery Models: the Return of the Rodent

Animal experiments have provided many insights on auditory function, notably in cases of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). However, it is not always clear how these findings translate to the human auditory system in clinically relevant contexts. Cross-species computational models of the auditory periphery can help bridge the gap between non-invasive human diagnostics and experimental evidence from animal studies. In this work we adapted a 1-D nonlinear cochlear transmission-line model designed for the human auditory periphery to mouse and gerbil, enabling a single computational framework for cross-species research on SNHL. Species-specific anatomical and physiological parameters - including basilar membrane (BM) length and width, stapes area, middle-ear transfer functions, and frequency range - were adjusted to match each species' auditory periphery and hearing range. Other cochlear parameters were calibrated to reproduce realistic cochlear tuning and compression. The adapted mouse and gerbil models were validated against experimental BM velocity level-growth characteristics, auditory-nerve (AN) tuning curves, and DPOAEs. Simulated AN outputs reasonably matched empirical measurements, including realistic AN thresholds and frequency selectivity. However, the discrepancy between simulations and measurements became larger for cochlear sections closer to the base or apex. Simulations of cochlear synaptopathy reproduced observed differences in recorded auditory brainstem and envelope following responses from mice and gerbils with SNHL. OHC individualization of the mouse model based on DPOAEs failed to faithfully reproduce individual measurements, although intergroup differences in OHC damage were captured. Our findings demonstrate that biophysically grounded auditory models can be translated across species while preserving realistic sound-coding properties and pathophysiological alterations.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.