Paper detail

Computational Assessment of Biomass Dust Explosions in the 20L Sphere

Determination of the explosion severity parameters of biomass is crucial for the safety management and dust explosion risk assessment of biomass-processing industries. These are commonly determined following experimental tests in the 20L sphere according to the international standards. Recently, CFD simulations have emerged as a reliable alternative to predict the explosion behavior with good accuracy and reduced labor and capital. In this work, numerical simulations of biomass dust explosions are conducted with the open-source CFD code OpenFOAM. The multi-phase (gas-solid) flow is treated in an Eulerian-Lagrangian framework, using a two-way coupling regime and considering the reactions of biomass conversion (moisture evaporation, devolatilization, and char oxidation), the combustion of volatile gases, and convective and radiative heat transfer. The model is validated with pressure-time and concentration-dependent experimental measurements of two biomass samples. Results suggest that the characteristics of the cold-flow (ı.e. turbulence levels, actual dust concentration, spatial distribution of the dust cloud, and turbophoresis effect) govern the course of the explosion process, and depend strongly on particle size, dust concentration, and ignition delay time effects. These findings may be relevant in the design of better dust explosion testing devices and to the reexamination of the guidelines for the operation of the experiment. Finally, a thorough discussion on the explosion pressures, degree of biomass conversion, flame temperature, flame propagation patterns, and the dust agglomeration effect is presented.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.