Paper detail

Compton thick active galactic nuclei in Chandra surveys

We present the results from an X-ray spectral analysis of active galactic nuclei (AGN) in the Chandra Deep Field-South, AEGIS-XD and Chandra-COSMOS surveys, focussing on the identification and characterisation of the most heavily obscured, Compton thick (CT, $N_{H}>10^{24} cm^{-2}$) sources. Our sample is comprised of 3184 X-ray selected extragalactic sources, which has a high rate of redshift completeness (97.6 %), and includes improved photometric redshifts over previous studies. We use spectral models designed for heavily obscured AGN which self consistently include all major spectral signatures of heavy absorption. We identify CT sources not selected through our spectral fitting method using X-ray colours, validate our spectral fitting method through simulations, and take considerations for the constraints on $N_{H}$ given the low count nature of many of our sources. After these considerations we identify a total of 100 CT AGN with best-fit $N_{H}>10^{24} cm^{-2}$ and $N_{H}$ constrained to be above $10^{23.5} cm^{-2}$ at 90% confidence. These sources cover an intrinsic $L_{X}$ range of $10^{42}-3x10^{45}$ ergs s$^{-1}$ and a redshift range of z=0.1-4. This sample will enable characterisation of these heavily obscured AGN across cosmic time and to ascertain their cosmological significance. Furthermore, by using the torus models to test different covering factor scenarios, and by investigating the inclusion of the soft scattered emission, we find evidence that the covering factor of the obscuring material decreases with $L_{X}$ for all redshifts, consistent with the receding torus model, and that this factor increases with redshift, consistent with an increase in the obscured fraction towards higher redshifts. We make $N_{H}$, $Γ$ (with uncertainties), observed X-ray fluxes and intrinsic $L_{X}$ for all sources analysed in this work publicly available in an online catalogue.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.