Paper detail

Compressible turbulent mixing: Effects of Schmidt number

We investigated the effects of Schmidt number on passive scalar transport in forced compressible turbulence. In the inertial-convective range the scalar spectrum followed the k^{-5/3} power law. For Sc >> 1, there appeared a k^{-1} power law in the viscous-convective range, while for Sc << 1, a k^{-17/3} power law was identified in the inertial-diffusive range. The scaling constant for the mixed third-order structure function of velocity-scalar increment grew over Sc, and the effect of compressibility made it smaller than the classical 4/3 value. At small amplitudes, the PDF of scalar fluctuations collapsed to the Gaussian distribution, whereas at large amplitudes it decayed more quickly than Gaussian. At large scales, the PDF of scalar increment behaved similarly to that of scalar fluctuation, while at small scales it resembled the PDF of scalar gradient. The scalar dissipation occurring at large magnitudes was found to grow with Sc. Due to low molecular diffusivity, for Sc >> 1, the scalar field rolled up and got mixed sufficiently. However, for Sc << 1, the scalar field lost the small-scale structures by high molecular diffusivity, and retained only the large-scale, cloudlike structures. The spectral densities of scalar advection and dissipation in both Sc >> 1 and Sc << 1 flows followed the k^{-5/3} scaling. This indicated that in compressible turbulence the processes of advection and dissipation except that of scalar-dilatation coupling might defer to the Kolmogorov picture. It then showed that at high wavenumbers, the magnitudes of spectral coherency in both Sc >> 1 and Sc << 1 flows decayed faster than the theoretical prediction of k^{-2/3} for incompressible flows. Finally, the comparison with incompressible results showed that the scalar in compressible turbulence with Sc=1 lacked a conspicuous bump structure in its spectrum, but was more intermittent in the dissipative range.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.