Paper detail

Compressible Hydrodynamic Mean-Field Equations in Spherical Geometry and their Application to Turbulent Stellar Convection Data

We present a statistical analysis of turbulent convection in stars within our Reynolds-Averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) framework in spherical geometry which we derived from first principles. The primary results reported in this document include: (1) an extensive set of mean-field equations for compressible, multi-species hydrodynamics, and (2) corresponding mean-field data computed from various simulation models. Some supplementary scale analysis data is also presented. The simulation data which is presented includes: (1) shell convection during oxygen burning in a 23 solar mass supernova progenitor, (2) envelope convection in a 5 solar mass red giant, (3) shell convection during the helium flash, and (4) a hydrogen injection flash in a 1.25 solar mass star. These simulations have been partially described previously in Meakin [2006], Meakin and Arnett [2007a,b, 2010], Arnett et al. [2009, 2010], Viallet et al. [2011, 2013a,b] and Mocak et al. [2009, 2011]. New data is also included in this document with several new domain and resolution configurations as well as some variations in the physical model such as convection zone depth and driving source term. The long term goal of this work is to aid in the development of more sophisticated models for treating hydrodynamic phenomena (e.g., turbulent convection) in the field of stellar evolution by providing a direct link between 3D simulation data and the mean fields which are modeled by 1D stellar evolution codes. As such, this data can be used to test previously proposed turbulence models found in the literature and sometimes used in stellar modeling. This data can also serve to test basic physical principles for model building and inspire new prescriptions for use in 1D evolution codes.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.