Paper detail

Compressibility Measures for Affinely Singular Random Vectors

There are several ways to measure the compressibility of a random measure; they include general approaches such as using the rate-distortion curve, as well as more specific notions, such as the Renyi information dimension (RID). The RID parameter indicates the concentration of the measure around lower-dimensional subsets of the space. While the evaluation of such compressibility parameters is well-studied for continuous and discrete measures, the case of discrete-continuous measures is quite subtle. In this paper, we focus on a class of multi-dimensional random measures that have singularities on affine lower-dimensional subsets. This class of distributions naturally arises when considering linear transformation of component-wise independent discrete-continuous random variables. To measure the compressibility of such distributions, we introduce the new notion of dimensional-rate bias (DRB) which is closely related to the entropy and differential entropy in discrete and continuous cases, respectively. Similar to entropy and differential entropy, DRB is useful in evaluating the mutual information between distributions of the aforementioned type. Besides the DRB, we also evaluate the the RID of these distributions. We further provide an upper-bound for the RID of multi-dimensional random measures that are obtained by Lipschitz functions of component-wise independent discrete-continuous random variables ($\mathbf{X}$). The upper-bound is shown to be achievable when the Lipschitz function is $A \mathbf{X}$, where $A$ satisfies {\changed$\spark({A_{m\times n}}) = m+1$} (e.g., Vandermonde matrices). When considering discrete-domain moving-average processes with non-Gaussian excitation noise, the above results allow us to evaluate the block-average RID and DRB, as well as to determine a relationship between these parameters and other existing compressibility measures.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.