Paper detail

Compressed Vertical Partitioning for Full-In-Memory RDF Management

The Web of Data has been gaining momentum and this leads to increasingly publish more semi-structured datasets following the RDF model, based on atomic triple units of subject, predicate, and object. Although it is a simple model, compression methods become necessary because datasets are increasingly larger and various scalability issues arise around their organization and storage. This requirement is more restrictive in RDF stores because efficient SPARQL resolution on the compressed RDF datasets is also required. This article introduces a novel RDF indexing technique (called k2-triples) supporting efficient SPARQL resolution in compressed space. k2-triples, uses the predicate to vertically partition the dataset into disjoint subsets of pairs (subject, object), one per predicate. These subsets are represented as binary matrices in which 1-bits mean that the corresponding triple exists in the dataset. This model results in very sparse matrices, which are efficiently compressed using k2-trees. We enhance this model with two compact indexes listing the predicates related to each different subject and object, in order to address the specific weaknesses of vertically partitioned representations. The resulting technique not only achieves by far the most compressed representations, but also the best overall performance for RDF retrieval in our experiments. Our approach uses up to 10 times less space than a state of the art baseline, and outperforms its performance by several order of magnitude on the most basic query patterns. In addition, we optimize traditional join algorithms on k2-triples and define a novel one leveraging its specific features. Our experimental results show that our technique overcomes traditional vertical partitioning for join resolution, reporting the best numbers for joins in which the non-joined nodes are provided, and being competitive in the majority of the cases.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.