Paper detail

Comprehensive Photometric Investigation of an Active Early K-type Contact System -- IL Cnc

Comprehensive photometric investigation was carried out to the early K-type contact binary - IL Cnc. A few light curves from both ground-based telescopes and the Kepler space telescope were obtained (or downloaded) and then analyzed in detail. They are mostly found to be asymmetric and there are even continuously changing O'Connell effect in the light curves from Kepler K2 data, suggesting the system to be highly active. Using the Wilson-Devinney code (version 2013), photometric solutions were derived and then compared. It is found that the calculation of the mass ratio is easily affected by the spot settings. Combining the radial velocities determined from LAMOST median resolution spectral data, the mass ratio of the binary components is found to be $M_2/M_1 = 1.76\pm 0.05$. The components are in shallow contact ($f\sim 9\%$) and have a temperature difference about $T_2 - T_1 = -280\pm 20$ K. The system is demonstrated to be W-subtype, which may be a common feature of K-type contact binaries. The masses of the binary components were estimated to be $M_1\sim 0.51$ M$_{sun}$ and $M_2\sim 0.90$ M$_{sun}$. The values are in good agreement with that deduced from the parallax data of Gaia. The results suggest that the primary component lacks luminosity compared with the zero main sequence. The H$α$ spectral line of the primary component is found to be peculiar. Combining newly determined minimum light times with those collected from literature, the orbital period of IL Cnc is studied. It is found that the (O$-$C)s of the primary minima show sinusoidal variation while the secondary do not. The oscillation is more likely to be caused by the starspot activities. Yet this assumption needs more data to support.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.