Paper detail

Composition and fate of short-period super-Earths: The case of CoRoT-7b

The discovery of CoRoT-7b, a planet of radius 1.68 +/- 0.09 R_E, mass 4.8 +/- 0.8 M_E and orbital period of 0.854 days demonstrates that small planets can orbit extremely close to their star. We use knowledge of hot Jupiters, mass loss estimates and models for the interior structure and evolution of planets to understand its composition, structure and evolution. The inferred mass and radius of CoRoT-7b are consistent with a rocky planet that would be depleted in iron relative to Earth. However, a one sigma increase in mass (5.6 M_E) and decrease in size (1.59 R_E) are compatible with an Earth-like composition (33% iron, 67% silicates). Alternatively, it is possible that CoRoT-7b contains a significant amount of volatiles. An equally good fit to the data is found for a vapor envelope equal to 3% (and up to 10%) by mass above an Earth-like nucleus. Because of its intense irradiation and small size, the planet cannot possess an envelope of H and He of more than 1/10,000 of its total mass. We show that the mass loss is significant (~ 10^11 g/s) and independent of planetary composition. This is because the hydrodynamical escape rate is independent of the atmosphere's mean molecular mass, and owing to the intense irradiation, even a bare rocky planet would possess an equilibrium vapor atmosphere thick enough to capture stellar UV photons. This escape rate rules out the possibility of a H-He envelope as it would escape in only ~1 Ma. A water vapor atmosphere would escape in ~ 1 Ga, and thus it is a plausible scenario. The origin of CoRoT-7b cannot be inferred from present observations: It may have formed rocky; or be the remnant of a Uranus-like ice giant, or a gas giant with a small core that was stripped of its gaseous envelope.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.