Paper detail

Composition analysis based on Bayesian methods

In this work we test the most widely used methods for fitting the composition fraction in data, namely maximum likelihood, $χ^2$, mean value of the distributions and mean value of the posterior probability function. We discuss the discrimination power of the four methods in different scenarios: signal to noise discrimination; two signals; and distributions of Xmax for mixed primary mass composition. We introduce a "distance" parameter, which can be used to estimate, as a rule of thumb, the precision of the discrimination. Finally, we conclude that the most reliable methods in all the studied scenarios are the maximum likelihood and the mean value of the posterior probability function.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.