Paper detail

Composite Re-Ranking for Efficient Document Search with BERT

Although considerable efforts have been devoted to transformer-based ranking models for document search, the relevance-efficiency tradeoff remains a critical problem for ad-hoc ranking. To overcome this challenge, this paper presents BECR (BERT-based Composite Re-Ranking), a composite re-ranking scheme that combines deep contextual token interactions and traditional lexical term-matching features. In particular, BECR exploits a token encoding mechanism to decompose the query representations into pre-computable uni-grams and skip-n-grams. By applying token encoding on top of a dual-encoder architecture, BECR separates the attentions between a query and a document while capturing the contextual semantics of a query. In contrast to previous approaches, this framework does not perform expensive BERT computations during online inference. Thus, it is significantly faster, yet still able to achieve high competitiveness in ad-hoc ranking relevance. Finally, an in-depth comparison between BECR and other start-of-the-art neural ranking baselines is described using the TREC datasets, thereby further demonstrating the enhanced relevance and efficiency of BECR.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.