Paper detail

Componentwise Linearity of Powers of Cover Ideals

Let $G$ be a finite simple graph and $J(G)$ denote its vertex cover ideal in a polynomial ring over a field. % $\mathbb{K}$. The $k$-th symbolic power of $J(G)$ is denoted by $J(G)^{(k)}$. In this paper, we give a criteria for cover ideals of vertex decomposable graphs to have the property that all their symbolic powers are not componentwise linear. Also, we give a necessary and sufficient condition on $G$ so that $J(G)^{(k)}$ is a componentwise linear ideal for some (equivalently, for all) $k \geq 2$ when $G$ is a graph such that $G \setminus N_G[A]$ has a simplicial vertex for any independent set $A$ of $G$. Using this result, we prove that $J(G)^{(k)}$ is a componentwise linear ideal for several classes of graphs for all $k \geq 2$. In particular, if $G$ is a bipartite graph, then $J(G)$ is a componentwise linear ideal if and only if $J(G)^k$ is a componentwise linear ideal for some (equivalently, for all) $k \geq 2$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.