Paper detail

Complexity of Unconstrained L_2-L_p Minimization

We consider the unconstrained $L_2$-$L_p$ minimization: find a minimizer of $\|Ax-b\|^2_2+λ\|x\|^p_p$ for given $A \in R^{m\times n}$, $b\in R^m$ and parameters $λ>0$, $p\in [0,1)$. This problem has been studied extensively in variable selection and sparse least squares fitting for high dimensional data. Theoretical results show that the minimizers of the $L_2$-$L_p$ problem have various attractive features due to the concavity and non-Lipschitzian property of the regularization function $\|\cdot\|^p_p$. In this paper, we show that the $L_q$-$L_p$ minimization problem is strongly NP-hard for any $p\in [0,1)$ and $q\ge 1$, including its smoothed version. On the other hand, we show that, by choosing parameters $(p,λ)$ carefully, a minimizer, global or local, will have certain desired sparsity. We believe that these results provide new theoretical insights to the studies and applications of the concave regularized optimization problems.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.