Paper detail

Complexity of Coloring Graphs without Paths and Cycles

Let $P_t$ and $C_\ell$ denote a path on $t$ vertices and a cycle on $\ell$ vertices, respectively. In this paper we study the $k$-coloring problem for $(P_t,C_\ell)$-free graphs. Maffray and Morel, and Bruce, Hoang and Sawada, have proved that 3-colorability of $P_5$-free graphs has a finite forbidden induced subgraphs characterization, while Hoang, Moore, Recoskie, Sawada, and Vatshelle have shown that $k$-colorability of $P_5$-free graphs for $k \geq 4$ does not. These authors have also shown, aided by a computer search, that 4-colorability of $(P_5,C_5)$-free graphs does have a finite forbidden induced subgraph characterization. We prove that for any $k$, the $k$-colorability of $(P_6,C_4)$-free graphs has a finite forbidden induced subgraph characterization. We provide the full lists of forbidden induced subgraphs for $k=3$ and $k=4$. As an application, we obtain certifying polynomial time algorithms for 3-coloring and 4-coloring $(P_6,C_4)$-free graphs. (Polynomial time algorithms have been previously obtained by Golovach, Paulusma, and Song, but those algorithms are not certifying); To complement these results we show that in most other cases the $k$-coloring problem for $(P_t,C_\ell)$-free graphs is NP-complete. Specifically, for $\ell=5$ we show that $k$-coloring is NP-complete for $(P_t,C_5)$-free graphs when $k \ge 4$ and $t \ge 7$; for $\ell \ge 6$ we show that $k$-coloring is NP-complete for $(P_t,C_\ell)$-free graphs when $k \ge 5$, $t \ge 6$; and additionally, for $\ell=7$, we show that $k$-coloring is also NP-complete for $(P_t,C_7)$-free graphs if $k = 4$ and $t\ge 9$. This is the first systematic study of the complexity of the $k$-coloring problem for $(P_t,C_\ell)$-free graphs. We almost completely classify the complexity for the cases when $k \geq 4, \ell \geq 4$, and identify the last three open cases.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.