Paper detail

Complexity guarantees for an implicit smoothing-enabled method for stochastic MPECs

Stochastic MPECs have found increasing relevance for modeling a broad range of settings in engineering and statistics. Yet, there seem to be no efficient first/zeroth-order schemes equipped with non-asymptotic rate guarantees for resolving even deterministic variants of such problems. We consider SMPECs where the parametrized lower-level equilibrium problem is given by a deterministic/stochastic VI problem whose mapping is strongly monotone. We develop a zeroth-order implicit algorithmic framework by leveraging a locally randomized spherical smoothing scheme. We present schemes for single-stage and two-stage stochastic MPECs when the upper-level problem is either convex or nonconvex. (I). Single-stage SMPECs: In convex regimes, our proposed inexact schemes are characterized by a complexity in upper-level projections, upper-level samples, and lower-level projections of $\mathcal{O}(\tfrac{1}{ε^2})$, $\mathcal{O}(\tfrac{1}{ε^2})$, and $\mathcal{O}(\tfrac{1}{ε^2}\ln(\tfrac{1}ε))$ , respectively. Analogous bounds for the nonconvex regime are $\mathcal{O}(\tfrac{1}ε)$, $\mathcal{O}(\tfrac{1}{ε^2})$, and $\mathcal{O}(\tfrac{1}{ε^3})$, respectively . (II). Two-stage SMPECs: In convex regimes, our proposed inexact schemes have a complexity in upper-level projections, upper-level samples, and lower-level projections of $\mathcal{O}(\tfrac{1}{ε^2}),\mathcal{O}(\tfrac{1}{ε^2})$, and $\mathcal{O}(\tfrac{1}{ε^2}\ln(\tfrac{1}ε))$ while the corresponding bounds in the nonconvex regime are $\mathcal{O}(\tfrac{1}ε)$, $\mathcal{O}(\tfrac{1}{ε^2})$, and $\mathcal{O}(\tfrac{1}{ε^2}\ln(\tfrac{1}ε))$ , respectively . In addition, we derive statements for exact as well as accelerated counterparts. We also provide a comprehensive set of numerical results for validating the theoretical findings.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.