Paper detail

Complexity analysis of quantum teleportation via different entangled channels in the presence of noise

Quantum communication is one of the hot topics in quantum computing, where teleportation of a quantum state has a slight edge and gained significant attention from researchers. A large number of teleportation schemes have already been introduced so far. Here, we compare the teleportation of a single qubit message among different entangled channels such as the two-qubit Bell channel, three-qubit GHZ channel, two- and three-qubit cluster states, the highly entangled five-qubit Brown \emph{et al.} state and the six-qubit Borras \emph{et al.} state. We calculate and compare the quantum costs in each of the cases. Furthermore, we study the effects of six noise models, namely bit-flip noise, phase-flip noise, bit-phase flip noise, amplitude damping, phase damping and the depolarizing error that may affect the communication channel used for the teleportation. An investigation on the variation of the initial state's fidelity with respect to the teleported state in the presence of the noise model is performed. A visual representation of the variation of fidelity for various values of the noise parameter $η$ is done through a graph plot. It is observed that as the value of noise parameter in the range $η\in [0,0.5]$, the fidelity decreases in all the entangled channels under all the noise models. After that, in the Bell channel, GHZ channel and three-qubit cluster state channel, the fidelity shows an upward trend under all the noise models. However, in the other three channels, the fidelity substantially decreases in the case of amplitude damping, phase damping and depolarizing noise, and even it reaches zero for $η= 1$ in Brown \emph{et al.} and Borras \emph{et al.} channels.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.