Paper detail

Complexified Ward Identity in pure Yang-Mills theory at tree-level

Up until now, the BCFW technique has been a widely used method in getting the amplitudes in various theories. Usually, the vanishing of the boundary term is necessary for the efficiency of the method. However, there are also many kinds of amplitudes which will have boundary terms. Hence it will be nice if it is possible to get the boundary terms in an efficient manner. As is well-known, in gauge theory the Ward identity imposes constraints on the form of the amplitude. In [1], we studied the Ward identity with a pair of shifted lines and the implied recursion relations. In this article, we discuss the complexified Ward identity in more detail. In particular we give a proof of the complexified Ward identity directly from the Feynman rules in Feynman-Lorentz gauge. Furthermore, we give more examples in calculating the one-line off-shell currents using this technique.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.