Paper detail

Complexes Detection in Biological Networks via Diversified Dense Subgraphs Mining

Protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks, providing a comprehensive landscape of protein interacting patterns, enable us to explore biological processes and cellular components at multiple resolutions. For a biological process, a number of proteins need to work together to perform the job. Proteins densely interact with each other, forming large molecular machines or cellular building blocks. Identification of such densely interconnected clusters or protein complexes from PPI networks enables us to obtain a better understanding of the hierarchy and organization of biological processes and cellular components. Most existing methods apply efficient graph clustering algorithms on PPI networks, often failing to detect possible densely connected subgraphs and overlapped subgraphs. Besides clustering-based methods, dense subgraph enumeration methods have also been used, which aim to find all densely connected protein sets. However, such methods are not practically tractable even on a small yeast PPI network, due to high computational complexity. In this paper, we introduce a novel approximate algorithm to efficiently enumerate putative protein complexes from biological networks. The key insight of our algorithm is that we do not need to enumerate all dense subgraphs. Instead we only need to find a small subset of subgraphs that cover as many proteins as possible. The problem is formulated as finding a diverse set of dense subgraphs, where we develop highly effective pruning techniques to guarantee efficiency. To handle large networks, we take a divide-and-conquer approach to speed up the algorithm in a distributed manner. By comparing with existing clustering and dense subgraph-based algorithms on several human and yeast PPI networks, we demonstrate that our method can detect more putative protein complexes and achieves better prediction accuracy.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.