Paper detail

Complex Investigation of SBS Galaxies in Seven Selected Fields

The main criterium for the selection of active objects in the First Byurakan Survey was the presence of uv-excess on low-dispersion spectra registered on photographic plates obtained with the 1m Shmidt type Byurakan telescope. Using the presence of emission lines as the second criterium became possible during the Second Byurakan Survey due to its improved technique. Through this criterium a majority of objects, extended by morphology, were selected into the separate "sample of galaxies". Certainly, there were cases of untrue selection, particularly, on faint magnitudes, when absorption lines were taken for emission ones and so on. Study of SBS galaxies, including evaluation of an effectivity of selection criteria, was undertaken by means of complex investigation of their very representative part, pooled in our basic sample. The completion of the follow-up slit spectroscopy of these about 500 objects formed the main stage of implementation of this program. Also, the scheme was developed to provide homogeneous classification, directed, in particular, to separate galaxies of AGN activity, of known types, and starforming, SfG, activity. For starforming galaxies, which constitute more than 80% of the basic sample, we provided two classes, SfGcontinual and SfGnebular. Averaged statistics of our SfG galaxies show, that every fifth of them is in more active, nebular phase of starforming activity, most of which are known as blue compact galaxies. However, it must be noted, that, by the analysis, namely for the latter objects, the effectiveness of the survey is the highest, so that BCGs represent the best product of SBS among extended objects. Aimed on further specifications in classification of SfG galaxies, other generalizations and statistics in frames of ongoing investigation, detailed studies of individual galaxies are currently beeing held, based on data of panoramic spectroscopy.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.