Paper detail

Complex Analysis of the Stellar Binary HD25811; A Subgiant System

The visually close binary system HD25811 is analyzed to estimate its physical and geometrical parameters in addition to its spectral type and luminosity class. The method depends on obtaining the best fit between the entire observational spectral energy distribution (SED) of the system and synthetic SEDs created by atmospheric modeling of the individual components, consistent with the system's modified orbital elements. The parameters of the individual components of the system are derived as: $T_{\rm eff}^{\rm a} =6850\pm50$\,K, $T_{\rm eff}^{\rm b} =7000\pm50$\,K, log $g_{\rm a}=4.04\pm0.10$, log $g_{\rm b}=4.15\pm0.10$, $R_{\rm a}=1.96\pm0.20$\,R$_{\odot}$, $R_{\rm b}=1.69\pm0.20$\,R$_{\odot}$, $M_{va}=1.97\pm0.20$, $M_{vb}=2.19\pm0.20$, $L_a= 7.59\pm0.70 L_\odot, L_b= 6.16\pm0.70 L_\odot$ with dynamical parallax $π(\textrm{mas})=5.095\pm 0.095$. The analysis shows that the system consists of a $1.55M_{\odot}$ F2 primary star and a less evolved $1.50M_{\odot}$ F1 secondary subgiant star with ages around 2 Gy formed by fragmentation. Synthetic magnitudes of both components were calculated under Johnson-Cousins, Strömgren, and Tycho photometrical systems.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.