Paper detail

Completing the X-ray view of the recently discovered supernova remnant G53.41+0.03

Aims: We present a detailed X-ray study of the recently discovered supernova remnant (SNR) G53.41+0.03 that follows up and further expands on the previous, limited analysis of archival data covering a small portion of the SNR. Methods: With the new dedicated 70ks XMM-Newton observation we investigate the morphological structure of the SNR in X-rays, search for a presence of a young neutron star and characterise the plasma conditions in the selected regions by means of spectral fitting. Results: The first full view of SNR G53.41+0.03 shows an X-ray emission region well aligned with the reported half-shell radio morphology. We find three distinct regions of the remnant that vary in brightness and hardness of the spectra, and are all best characterised by a hot plasma model in a non-equilibrium ionisation state. Of the three regions, the brightest one contains the most mature plasma, with ionisation age $τ\approx 4\times10^{10}$s cm$^{-3}$ (where $τ= n_e t$), a lower electron temperature of kT$_\mathrm{e} \approx 1$ keV and the highest estimated gas density of n$_\mathrm{H}\approx 0.87$ cm$^{-3}$. The second, fainter but spectrally harder, region reveals a younger plasma ($τ\approx 1.7\times10^{10}$s cm$^{-3}$) with higher temperature (kT$_\mathrm{e} \approx 2$ keV) and two to three times lower density (n$_\mathrm{H}\approx 0.34$ cm$^{-3}$). The third region is very faint, but we identify spectroscopically the presence of a hot plasma.Employing several methods for age estimation, we find the remnant to be $t \approx 1000-5000$ yrs old, confirming the earlier reports of a relatively young age. The environment of the remnant also contains a number of point sources, of which most are expected to be positioned in the foreground. Of the two point sources in the geometrical centre of the remnant one is consistent with the characteristics of a young neutron star.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.