Paper detail

Completeness-resolvable graphs

Given a connected graph $G=(V(G), E(G))$, the length of a shortest path from a vertex $u$ to a vertex $v$ is denoted by $d(u,v)$. For a proper subset $W$ of $V(G)$, let $m(W)$ be the maximum value of $d(u,v)$ as $u$ ranging over $W$ and $v$ ranging over $V(G)\setminus W$. The proper subset $W=\{w_1,\ldots,w_{|W|}\}$ is a {\em completeness-resolving set} of $G$ if $$ Ψ_W: V(G)\setminus W \longrightarrow [m(W)]^{|W|},\qquad u\longmapsto (d(w_1,u),\ldots,d(w_{|W|},u)) $$ is a bijection, where $$ [m(W)]^{|W|}=\{(a_{(1)},\ldots,a_{(|W|)})\mid 1\leq a_{(i)}\leq m(W)\text{ for each }i=1,\ldots,|W|\}. $$ A graph is {\em completeness-resolvable} if it admits a completeness-resolving set. In this paper, we first construct the set of all completeness-resolvable graphs by using the edge coverings of some vertices in given bipartite graphs, and then establish posets on some subsets of this set by the spanning subgraph relationship. Based on each poset, we find the maximum graph and give the lower and upper bounds for the number of edges in a minimal graph. Furthermore, minimal graphs satisfying the lower or upper bound are characterized.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.