Paper detail

Completeness of ``Good'' Bethe Ansatz Solutions of a Quantum Group Invariant Heisenberg Model

The $sl_q(2)$-quantum group invariant spin 1/2 XXZ-Heisenberg model with open boundary conditions is investigated by means of the Bethe ansatz. As is well known, quantum groups for $q$ equal to a root of unity possess a finite number of ``good'' representations with non-zero q-dimension and ``bad'' ones with vanishing q-dimension. Correspondingly, the state space of an invariant Heisenberg chain decomposes into ``good'' and ``bad'' states. A ``good'' state may be described by a path of only ``good'' representations. It is shown that the ``good'' states are given by all ``good'' Bethe ansatz solutions with roots restricted to the first periodicity strip, i.e. only positive parity strings (in the language of Takahashi) are allowed. Applying Bethe's string counting technique completeness of the ``good'' Bethe states is proven, i.e. the same number of states is found as the number of all restricted path's on the $sl_q(2)$-Bratteli diagram. It is the first time that a ``completeness" proof for an anisotropic quantum invariant reduced Heisenberg model is performed.

preprint1994arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.