Paper detail

Competitive Selection of Ephemeral Relays in Wireless Networks

We consider a setting in which two nodes (referred to as forwarders) compete to choose a relay node from a set of relays, as they ephemerally become available (e.g., wake up from a sleep state). Each relay, when it arrives, offers a (possibly different) "reward" to each forwarder. Each forwarder's objective is to minimize a combination of the delay incurred in choosing a relay and the reward offered by the chosen relay. As an example, we develop the reward structure for the specific problem of geographical forwarding over a network of sleep-wake cycling relays. We study two variants of the generic relay selection problem, namely, the completely observable (CO) case where, when a relay arrives, both forwarders get to observe both rewards, and the partially observable (PO) case where each forwarder can only observe its own reward. Formulating the problem as a two person stochastic game, we characterize solution in terms of Nash Equilibrium Policy Pairs (NEPPs). For the CO case we provide a general structure of the NEPPs. For the PO case we prove that there exists an NEPP within the class of threshold policy pairs. We then consider the particular application of geographical forwarding of packets in a shared network of sleep-wake cycling wireless relays. For this problem, for a particular reward structure, using realistic parameter values corresponding to TelosB wireless mote, we numerically compare the performance (in terms of cost to both forwarders) of the various NEPPs and draw the following key insight: even for moderate separation between the two forwarders, the performance of the various NEPPs is close to the performance of a simple strategy where each forwarder behaves as if the other forwarder is not present. We also conduct simulation experiments to study the end-to-end performance of the simple forwarding policy.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.