Paper detail

Competition-colonization trade-off promotes coexistence of low-virulence viral strains

RNA viruses exist as genetically diverse populations displaying different phenotypes, including diverse degrees of virulence. The evolution of virulence in viral populations is, however, poorly understood. Based on the experimental observation of an RNA virus clone in cell culture diversifying into two subpopulations of different virulence, we study the dynamics of heterogeneous virus populations and the evolution of virulence. We introduce a competition-colonization trade-off into standard mathematical models of intra-host viral infection. Colonizers are fast spreading, virulent strains, whereas competitors are less virulent variants that are more successful within coinfected cells. We observe biphasic dynamics of the population: Early in the infection the population is dominated by colonizers, which later will be outcompeted by competitors. The simulations suggest the existence of a steady state where few low-virulence variants coexist. This equilibrium implies collective virulence attenuation in the population, in contrast to previous models predicting development of the population towards increased virulence. Nevertheless, the attenuation effect disappears if we include a highly simplified immune response in our models. Thus, the competition-colonization trade-off indicates a role for virulence in the modulation of the viral population diversity. The evolution of virulence is a dynamic feature of the population shaped by interactions between individuals and by the structure of the patchy habitat.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.