Paper detail

Competition between local erasure and long-range spreading of a single biochemical mark leads to epigenetic bistability

The mechanism through which cells determine their fate is intimately related to the spreading of certain biochemical (so-called epigenetic) marks along their genome. The mechanisms behind mark spreading and maintenance are not yet fully understood, and current models often assume a long-range infection-like process for the dynamics of marks, due to the polymeric nature of the chromatin fibre which allows looping between distant sites. While these existing models typically consider antagonising marks, here we propose a qualitatively different scenario which analyses the spreading of a single mark. We define a 1D stochastic model in which mark spreading/infection occurs as a long-range process whereas mark erasure/recovery is a local process, with an enhanced rate at boundaries of infected domains. In the limiting case where our model exhibits absorbing states, we find a first-order-like transition separating the marked/infected phase from the unmarked/recovered phase. This suggests that our model, in this limit, belongs to the long-range compact directed percolation universality class. The abrupt nature of the transition is retained in a more biophysically realistic situation when a basal infection/recovery rate is introduced (thereby removing absorbing states). Close to the transition there is a range of bistability where both the marked/infected and unmarked/recovered states are metastable and long lived, which provides a possible avenue for controlling fate decisions in cells. Increasing the basal infection/recovery rate, we find a second transition between a coherent (marked or unmarked) phase, and a mixed, or random, one.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.