Paper detail

Competing Channels for Hot Electron Cooling in Graphene

We report on temperature dependent photocurrent measurements of high-quality dual-gated monolayer graphene (MLG) p-n junction devices. A photothermoelectric (PTE) effect governs the photocurrent response in our devices, allowing us to track the hot electron temperature and probe hot electron cooling channels over a wide temperature range (4 K to 300 K). At high temperatures ($T > T^*$), we found that both the peak photocurrent and the hot spot size decreased with temperature, while at low temperatures ($T < T^*$), we found the opposite, namely that the peak photocurrent and the hot spot size increased with temperature. This non-monotonic temperature dependence can be understood as resulting from the competition between two hot electron cooling pathways: (a) (intrinsic) momentum-conserving normal collisions (NC) that dominates at low temperatures and (b) (extrinsic) disorder-assisted supercollisions (SC) that dominates at high temperatures. Gate control in our high quality samples allows us to resolve the two processes in the same device for the first time. The peak temperature $T^*$ depends on carrier density and disorder concentration, thus allowing for an unprecedented way of controlling graphene&#39;s photoresponse.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.