Paper detail

Compatibly split subvarieties of the Hilbert scheme of points in the plane

Let k be an algebraically closed field of characteristic p>2. By a result of Kumar and Thomsen, the standard Frobenius splitting of the affine plane induces a Frobenius splitting of the Hilbert scheme of n points in the plane. In this thesis, we investigate the question, "what is the stratification of the Hilbert scheme of points in the plane by all compatibly Frobenius split subvarieties?" We provide the answer to this question when n is at most 4 and we give a conjectural answer when n=5. We prove that this conjectural answer is correct up to the possible inclusion of one particular one-dimensional subvariety of the Hilbert scheme of 5 points, and we show that this particular one-dimensional subvariety is not compatibly split for at least those primes p between 3 and 23. Next, we restrict the splitting of the Hilbert scheme of n points in the plane (now for arbitrary n) to the affine open patch U_<x,y^n> and describe all compatibly split subvarieties of this patch and their defining ideals. We find degenerations of these subvarieties to Stanley-Reisner schemes, explicitly describe the associated simplicial complexes, and use these complexes to prove that certain compatibly split subvarieties of U_<x,y^n> are Cohen-Macaulay.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.