Paper detail

Compatible Connectivity-Augmentation of Planar Disconnected Graphs

Motivated by applications to graph morphing, we consider the following \emph{compatible connectivity-augmentation problem}: We are given a labelled $n$-vertex planar graph, $\mathcal{G}$, that has $r\ge 2$ connected components, and $k\ge 2$ isomorphic planar straight-line drawings, $G_1,\ldots,G_k$, of $\mathcal{G}$. We wish to augment $\mathcal G$ by adding vertices and edges to make it connected in such a way that these vertices and edges can be added to $G_1,\ldots,G_k$ as points and straight-line segments, respectively, to obtain $k$ planar straight-line drawings isomorphic to the augmentation of $\mathcal G$. We show that adding $Θ(nr^{1-1/k})$ edges and vertices to $\mathcal{G}$ is always sufficient and sometimes necessary to achieve this goal. The upper bound holds for all $r\in\{2,\ldots,n\}$ and $k\ge 2$ and is achievable by an algorithm whose running time is $O(nr^{1-1/k})$ for $k=O(1)$ and whose running time is $O(kn^2)$ for general values of $k$. The lower bound holds for all $r\in\{2,\ldots,n/4\}$ and $k\ge 2$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.