Paper detail

Compatibility, embedding and regularization of non-local random walks on graphs

Several variants of the graph Laplacian have been introduced to model non-local diffusion processes, which allow a random walker to {\textquotedblleft jump\textquotedblright} to non-neighborhood nodes, most notably the transformed path graph Laplacians and the fractional graph Laplacian. From a rigorous point of view, this new dynamics is made possible by having replaced the original graph $G$ with a weighted complete graph $G'$ on the same node-set, that depends on $G$ and wherein the presence of new edges allows a direct passage between nodes that were not neighbors in $G$. We show that, in general, the graph $G'$ is not compatible with the dynamics characterizing the original model graph $G$: the random walks on $G'$ subjected to move on the edges of $G$ are not stochastically equivalent, in the wide sense, to the random walks on $G$. From a purely analytical point of view, the incompatibility of $G'$ with $G$ means that the normalized graph $\hat{G}$ can not be embedded into the normalized graph $\hat{G}'$. Eventually, we provide a regularization method to guarantee such compatibility and preserving at the same time all the nice properties granted by $G'$.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.