Paper detail

Comparison Theorem for Viability Kernels via Conic Preorders

In natural resource management, decision-makers often aim at maintaining thestate of the system within a desirable set for all times.For instance, fisheries management procedures include keeping thespawning stock biomass over a critical threshold.Another example is given by the peak control of an epidemic outbreakthat encompasses maintaining thenumber of infected individuals below medical treatment capacities.In mathematical terms, one controls a dynamical system.Then, keeping the state of the system within a desirable set for all times is possible when the initial state belongs to the so-called viabilitykernel. We introduce the notion of conic quasimonotonicity reducibility.With this property, we provide a comparison theorem by inclusion between two viabilitykernels, corresponding to two control systems in the infinite horizon case. Wealso derive conditions for equality. We illustrate the method with a model for thebiocontrol of a vector-transmitted epidemic.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.