Paper detail

Comparison on gait characteristics between controlled and free-living conditions in old adults

Gait is an important biomarker of functional conditions and gait characteristics can help us assessing health conditions and managing progression of diseases. Most of the existing research study the gait in controlled condition, such as clinical tests. In this paper, we study the gait characteristics in free-living conditions in old adults and compare them with that in controlled conditions, i.e., Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. 65 subjects (12 patients with mobility impairment and 53 healthy controls) are recruited from elderly nursing institutions. The video data are collected from them in TUG test and free-living conditions and the 9 gait characteristics, including gait speed, are extracted from the data. Two-sample tests and independence test based on copula entropy are conducted on the extracted data to compare the characteristics in two conditions. Comparison results show that gait characteristics, such as gait speed, pace, speed variability, etc., in daily life are different from that of in TUG test. In daily life, people tend to have slow gait speed, smaller pace and speed variability, more frequent stride, and smaller acceleration range than in TUG test. We also found that gait speed, pace, and speed variability have stronger dependence with TUG score in the 3 conditions (TUG, daily life, and both) and that other 5 characteristics have stronger dependence with TUG score in both condition than in each condition. The comparison in this study suggests that TUG and daily life conditions are complementary with each other, and that TUG test can be considered as intervention on the movement state of human.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.