Paper detail

Comparison of the star formation of X-ray selected active galactic nuclei in eFEDS with star-forming galaxies

We use $\sim 1800$ X-ray Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) in the eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS), that span over two orders of magnitude in X-ray luminosity, $\rm L_{X,2-10keV} \approx 10^{43-45}\,ergs^{-1}$, and compare their star-formation rate (SFR) relative to that of non-AGN star-forming systems, at $\rm 0.5<z<1.5$. For that purpose, we compile a reference galaxy catalogue with $\sim 17000$ sources. Both samples have the same photometric coverage, from optical to far-infrared. We construct the spectral energy distributions (SEDs) of all sources and fit them using the CIGALE code, utilizing the same templates and parametric grid for both samples. We account for the mass incompleteness and exclude quiescent systems from both datasets. These allow us to compare the SFR of the two populations in a uniform manner, minimising systematic effects. Based on our analysis, AGN at low and moderate L$_X$ ($\rm L_{X,2-10keV} < 10^{44}\,ergs^{-1}$), have SFR that is lower, or at most, equal to that of star-forming galaxies, in agreement with previous studies. The large number of luminous X-ray AGN available in the eFEDS dataset, enable us to expand our investigations at higher L$_X$ to test previous, tentative results. At $\rm L_{X,2-10keV} > 10^{44.2}\,ergs^{-1}$, the SFR of AGN appears enhanced, by $\sim 30\%$, compared to that of star-forming sources, for systems with stellar mass, $\rm 10.5 < log\,[M_*(M_\odot)] < 11.5$, confirming indications found in previous studies. The most massive sources $\rm log\,[M_*(M_\odot)] > 11.5$, present a flat SFR$_{norm}$-L$_X$ relation up to $\rm L_{X,2-10keV} \sim 10^{44.5}\,ergs^{-1}$, with SFR similar to that of star-forming galaxies. However, at higher L$_X$ ($\rm L_{X,2-10keV} \sim 10^{45}\,ergs^{-1}$), we find indications that the SFR of these massive AGN hosts may be enhanced compared to that of non-AGN systems.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.