Paper detail

Comparison of the moments of the Xmax distribution predicted by different cosmic ray shower simulation models

In this paper we study the depth at which a cosmic ray shower reaches its maximum (\Xmax) as predicted by Monte Carlo simulation. The use of \Xmax in the determination of the primary particle mass can only be done by comparing the measured values with simulation predictions. For this reason it is important to study the differences between the available simulation models. We have done a study of the first and second moments of the \Xmax distribution using the \Corsika and \Conex programs. The study was done with high statistics in the energy range from $10^{17}$ to \energy{20.4}. We focus our analysis in the different implementations of the hadronic interaction models \Sibyll and \Qgsjet in \Corsika and \Conex. We show that the predictions of the \meanXmax and \sigmaXmax depend slightly on the combination of simulation program and hadronic interaction model. Although these differences are small, they are not negligible in some cases (up to 5 g/cm$^2$ for the worse case) and they should be considered as a systematic uncertainty of the model predictions for \meanXmax and \sigmaXmax. We have included a table with the suggested systematic uncertainties for the model predictions. Finally, we present a parametrization of the \Xmax distribution as a function of mass and energy according to the models \Sibyll and \Qgsjet, and showed an example of its application to obtain the predicted \Xmax distributions from cosmic ray propagation models.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.