Paper detail

Comparison of the electrochemical performance of CeO2 and rare earth-based mixed metallic oxide (Ce0.9Zr0.1O2) for supercapacitor applications

CeO2 and Ce0.9Zr0.1O2 are prepared from the sol-gel method to investigate and compare their electrochemical properties for supercapacitor applications. Structural, morphological, and elemental studies have been done for CeO2 and Ce0.9Zr0.1O2 by XRD, SEM, and EDX. Cyclic voltammetry, galvanostatic charge-discharge, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy techniques are used to study the electrochemical performance of these materials. Doping enhances the electrochemical performance of the electrode, by improving the specific capacitance (~150%, 243 F g-1 from 96 F g-1) for the doped system @2 mV s-1 Vs. Ag/AgCl reference electrode in 2 mol L-1 KOH electrolyte solution. Ce0.9Zr0.1O2 shows only ~30% of capacitance degradation for a ten folds increase in current densities. Ce0.9Zr0.1O2 also shows 16% capacitance degradation after 800 cycles with excellent Columbic efficiency (~100%) @2 A g-1 current density. Partial replacement of Ce4+ ion (0.97 Å) with Zr4+ ion (0.84 Å) results in a decrease in lattice parameter, as confirmed by Rietveld refinement. Ce0.9Zr0.1O2 has provided good energy, and power density of 1.128 Wh kg-1and 112.5 W kg-1 respectively. Furthermore, better diffusivity of the Ce0.9Zr0.1O2 in KOH electrolyte (indicated using Randles-Sevcik equation-based analysis) is correlated with better electrochemical performance. These insights presented here clearly indicate that Zr doping into CeO2 results in a promising candidate material for electrochemical and supercapacitive applications.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.