Paper detail

Comparison of some purities, flatnesses and injectivities

In this paper, we compare $(n,m)$-purities for different pairs of positive integers $(n,m)$. When $R$ is a commutative ring, these purities are not equivalent if $R$ doesn't satisfy the following property: there exists a positive integer $p$ such that, for each maximal ideal $P$, every finitely generated ideal of $R_P$ is $p$-generated. When this property holds, then the $(n,m)$-purity and the $(n,m')$-purity are equivalent if $m$ and $m'$ are integers $\geq np$. These results are obtained by a generalization of Warfield's methods. There are also some interesting results when $R$ is a semiperfect strongly $π$-regular ring. We also compare $(n,m)$-flatnesses and $(n,m)$-injectivities for different pairs of positive integers $(n,m)$. In particular, if $R$ is right perfect and right self $(\aleph_0,1)$-injective, then each $(1,1)$-flat right $R$-module is projective. In several cases, for each positive integer $p$, all $(n,p)$-flatnesses are equivalent. But there are some examples where the $(1,p)$-flatness is not equivalent to the $(1,p+1)$-flatness.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.