Paper detail

Comparison of simple mass estimators for slowly rotating elliptical galaxies

We compare the performance of mass estimators for elliptical galaxies that rely on the directly observable surface brightness and velocity dispersion profiles, without invoking computationally expensive detailed modeling. These methods recover the mass at a specific radius where the mass estimate is expected to be least sensitive to the anisotropy of stellar orbits. One method (Wolf et al. 2010) uses the total luminosity-weighted velocity dispersion and evaluates the mass at a 3D half-light radius $r_{1/2}$, i.e., it depends on the GLOBAL galaxy properties. Another approach (Churazov et al. 2010) estimates the mass from the velocity dispersion at a radius $R_2$ where the surface brightness declines as $R^{-2}$, i.e., it depends on the LOCAL properties. We evaluate the accuracy of the two methods for analytical models, simulated galaxies and real elliptical galaxies that have already been modeled by the Schwarzschild's orbit-superposition technique. Both estimators recover an almost unbiased circular speed estimate with a modest RMS scatter ($\lesssim 10 \%$). Tests on analytical models and simulated galaxies indicate that the local estimator has a smaller RMS scatter than the global one. We show by examination of simulated galaxies that the projected velocity dispersion at $R_2$ could serve as a good proxy for the virial galaxy mass. For simulated galaxies the total halo mass scales with $σ_p(R_2)$ as $M_{vir} \left[M_{\odot}h^{-1}\right] \approx 6\cdot 10^{12} \left( \frac{σ_p(R_2)}{200\, \rm km\, s^{-1}} \right)^{4}$ with RMS scatter $\approx 40 \%$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.