Paper detail

Comparison of regularized SCAN functional with SCAN functional with and without self-interaction for a wide-array of properties

The Strongly Constrained and Appropriately Normed (SCAN) functional is a non-empirical meta-generalized-gradient approximation (meta-GGA) functional that satisfies all the known constraints that a meta-GGA functional can, but it also exhibits a great degree of sensitivity to numerical grids. Its numerical complexities are amplified when used in Perdew-Zunger (PZ) self-interaction correction (SIC) which requires evaluating energies and potentials using orbital densities that vary far more rapidly than spin densities. Recent regularization of the SCAN functional (rSCAN) simplifies numerical complexities of SCAN at the expense of violation of some exact constraints. To develop a good understanding of the performance of rSCAN and the effect of loss of an exact constraint at the limit of slowly varying density, we have compared its performance against SCAN for vibrational frequencies, infra-red and Raman intensities of water clusters, electric dipole moments, spin magnetic moments of a few molecular magnets, weak interaction energies of dimers, barrier heights of reactions, and atomization energies for benchmark sets of molecules. Likewise, we examined the performance of SIC-rSCAN using the PZ-SIC method by studying atomic total energies, ionization potentials and electron affinities, molecular atomization energies, barrier heights, and dissociation and reaction energies. We find that rSCAN requires a much less dense numerical grid and gives very similar results as SCAN for all properties examined with the exception of atomization energies which are somewhat worse in rSCAN. On the other hand, SIC-rSCAN gives marginally better performance than SIC-SCAN for almost all properties studied in this work.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.