Paper detail

Comparison of piecewise-constant methods for dark energy

We compare four different methods that can be used to analyze the type Ia supernovae (SnIa) data, ie to use piecewise-constant functions in terms of: the dark energy equation of state $w(z)$, the deceleration parameter $q(z)$, the Hubble parameter $H(z)$ and finally the luminosity distance $d_L$. These four quantities cover all aspects of the accelerating Universe, ie the phenomenological properties of dark energy, the expansion rate (first and second derivatives) of the Universe and the observations themselves. For the first two cases we also perform principal component analysis (PCA) so as to decorrelate the parameters, while for the last two cases we use novel analytic expressions to find the best-fit parameters. In order to test the methods we create mock SnIa data (2000 points, uniform in redshift $z\in[0,1.5]$) for three fiducial cosmologies: the cosmological constant model ($Λ$CDM), a linear expansion of the dark energy equation of state parameter $w(a)=w_0+w_a(1-a)$ and the Hu-Sawicki $f(R)$ model. We find that if we focus on the two mainstream approaches for the PCA, i.e. $w(z)$ and $q(z)$, then the best piecewise-constant scheme is always $w(z)$. Finally, to our knowledge the piecewise-constant method for $H(z)$ is new in the literature, while for the rest three methods we present several new analytic expressions.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.