Paper detail

Comparison of methods for computing the exchange energy in laterally coupled quantum dots

We calculate the exchange energy in two dimensional laterally coupled quantum dots using Heitler-London, Hund-Mullikan and variational methods. We assess the quality of these approximations in zero and finite magnetic fields comparing against numerically exact results. We find that surprisingly, the Hund-Mullikan method does not offer any significant improvement over the much simpler Heitler-London method, whether at large or small interdot distances. Contrary to that, our variational ansatz proves substantially better. In a single dot at finite magnetic field, all approximate methods fail. This reflects the qualitative change of the single electron ground state from non-degenerate (harmonic oscillator) to highly degenerate (Landau level). However, we find that the magnetically induced failure does not occur in the most important, double-dot, regime.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.