Paper detail

Comparison of Integrators for Electromagnetic Particle in Cell Methods: Algorithms and Applications

In this paper, we present different types of integrators for electro-magnetic particle-in-cell (PIC) methods. While the integrator is an important tool of the PIC methods, it is necessary to characterize the different conservation approaches of the integrators, e.g. symplecticity, energy- or charge-conservation. We discuss the different principles, e.g. composition, filtering, explicit and implicit ideas. While, particle in cell methods are well-studied, the combination between the different parts, i.e. pusher, solver and approximations are hardly to analyze. we concentrate on choosing the optimal pusher component, with respect to conservation and convergence behavior. We discuss oscillations of the pusher component, strong external magnetic fields and optimal conservation of energy and momentum. The algorithmic ideas are discussed and numerical experiments compare the exactness of the different schemes. An outlook to overcome the different error components is discussed in the future works.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.