Paper detail

Comparison of edge turbulence characteristics between DIII-D and C-Mod simulations with XGC1

The physical processes taking place at the edge region are crucial for the operation of tokamaks as they govern the interaction of hot plasma with the vessel walls. Numerical modeling of the edge with state-of-the-art codes attempts to elucidate interactions between neoclassical drifts, turbulence, poloidal and parallel flows that control the physical set-up of the SOL region. Here, we present post-processing analysis of simulations from the gyrokinetic code XGC1, comparing edge turbulence characteristics from a simulation of DIII-D against one of C-Mod. We find that the equilibrium $E \times B$ flux across the separatrix has a similar poloidal pattern in both discharges which can be explained by magnetic drifts and trapped ion excursions. However, collisionality is noted to play a major role in that it prevents local charge accumulations from having global effects in C-Mod. In both cases, turbulent electron heat flux is higher than the ion one. This seems to be a universal characteristic of the tokamak edge. We identify turbulent frequencies and growth rates of the dominant mode in both simulations. In C-Mod, these numbers point to the presence of a drift wave. In DIII-D, linear simulations with Gene reveal a trapped electron mode. Furthermore, we present the amplitude and size distributions of the blobs from both simulations. Amplitude distributions are in qualitative agreement with experimental observations while size distributions are consistent with the fact that most blobs are not connecting to the divertor plates and suggest that they are generated by the shearing of the turbulent modes.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.