Paper detail

Comparison of Distance Metrics for Hierarchical Data in Medical Databases

Distance metrics are broadly used in different research areas and applications, such as bio-informatics, data mining and many other fields. However, there are some metrics, like pq-gram and Edit Distance used specifically for data with a hierarchical structure. Other metrics used for non-hierarchical data are the geometric and Hamming metrics. We have applied these metrics to The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database which has some hierarchical data. The THIN data has to be converted into a tree-like structure for the first group of metrics. For the second group of metrics, the data are converted into a frequency table or matrix, then for all metrics, all distances are found and normalised. Based on this particular data set, our research question: which of these metrics is useful for THIN data? This paper compares the metrics, particularly the pq-gram metric on finding the similarities of patients' data. It also investigates the similar patients who have the same close distances as well as the metrics suitability for clustering the whole patient population. Our results show that the two groups of metrics perform differently as they represent different structures of the data. Nevertheless, all the metrics could represent some similar data of patients as well as discriminate sufficiently well in clustering the patient population using $k$-means clustering algorithm.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.