Paper detail

Comparison of caloric effects in view of application

In the framework of solid-state cooling technology, four kinds of caloric effects, magnetocaloric (MC), electrocaloric (EC), barocaloric (BC) and elastocaloric (eC) effects, are compared in view of environment discussion and application fields. This field is primarily developed in the intention of protecting the environment. However, some widely researched caloric materials do not meet environmental friendly criteria. Currently, new caloric materials (called "good" material) possessing the properties of friendly environment, low cost, high caloric performance and practicability (low stress) need to be found. In view of application, all current caloric effects/materials are investigated for the common objective of cooling. However, the adapted application cases for different caloric effects/materials are not considered. Due to the different stimuli and different intrinsic properties (different caloric performance for different dimensions) of caloric materials, they can exhibit unique advantage to different application cases. "Good" caloric material used for large-scale application is still less and deserve more search. Purposeful research will save the cost and accelerate the commercialization.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.