Paper detail

Comparison of aerosol emissions during specific speech tasks

The study of aerosols and droplets emitted from the oral cavity has become increasingly important throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Studies show particulates emitted while speaking were generally much smaller compared to coughing or sneezing. However, recent investigations revealed that they are large enough to carry respiratory contagions. Although studies have shown that particulate emissions do indeed occur during speech, to date, there is little information about the relative contribution of different speech sounds in producing particle emissions. This study compares airborne aerosol generation in participants producing isolated speech sounds: fricative consonants, plosive consonants, and vowel sounds. While participants produced isolated speech tasks, a planar beam of laser light, a high-speed camera, and image software calculated the number of particulates detected overtime. This study compares airborne aerosols emitted by human participants at a distance of 2.54 cm between the laser sheet and the mouth and reveals statistically significant increases in particulate counts over ambient dust distribution for all speech sounds. Vowel sounds were statistically greater than consonants, suggesting that mouth opening, as opposed to place of vocal tract constriction or manner of sound production, might be the primary influence in the degree to which particulates become aerosolized during speech. Results of this research will inform boundary conditions for computation models of aerosolized particulates during speech.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.