Paper detail

Comparison Methods for a Keller--Segel-type Model of Pattern Formations with Density-suppressed Motilities

This paper is concerned with global existence as well as infinite-time blowups of classical solutions to the following fully parabolic kinetic system \begin{equation} \begin{cases} u_t=Δ(γ(v)u) v_t-Δv+v=u \end{cases} \qquad(0.1)\end{equation} in a smooth bounded domain $Ω\subset\mathbb{R}^n$, $n\geq1$ with no-flux boundary conditions. This model was recently proposed in [8,20] to describe the process of stripe pattern formations via the so-called self-trapping mechanism. The system features a signal-dependent motility function $γ(\cdot)$, which is decreasing in $v$ and will vanish as $v$ tends to infinity. The major difficulty in analysis comes from the possible degeneracy as $v\nearrow+\infty.$ In this work we develop a new comparison method different from the conventional energy method in literature, which reveals a striking fact that there is no finite-time degeneracy in this system. More precisely, we use comparison principles for elliptic and parabolic equations to prove that degeneracy cannot take place in finite time in any spatial dimensions for all smooth motility functions satisfying $γ(s)>0$, $γ'(s)\leq0$ when $s\geq0$ and $\lim\limits_{s\rightarrow+\infty}γ(s)=0.$ Then we investigate global existence of classical solutions to (0.1) when $n\leq3$ and discuss the uniform-in-time boundedness under certain growth conditions on $1/γ.$ In particular, we consider system (0.1) with $γ(v)=e^{-v}$. We prove that classical solution always exists globally, which must be uniformly-in-time bounded with arbitrary initial data of sub-critical mass. On the contrary, with certain initial data of super-critical mass, the solution will become unbounded at time infinity which differs from the finite-time blowup behavior of the Keller--Segel model.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.