Paper detail

Comparison and Combination of CRF Catalogues

In 2007, a joint IERS/IVS Working Group has been established to consider practical issues of creating the next ICRF generation, ICRF-2. The goal of the WG is to seek after ways to improve the existing ICRF. In this study we investigate a possibility of ICRF improvement by means of using combined ICRF catalogue instead of a catalogue computed in a single analysis centre, even though using most advanced models and software. In this work, we present a new version of Pulkovo combined catalogue of radio source positions computed using the method proposed in \cite{SokMal07}. Radio source catalogues that were submitted in 2007 in the framework of the WG activity were used as input for mutual comparison and combination. Four combined catalogues have been calculated: Two first of them provide a stochastic improvement of the ICRF, and last two of them allow us to account also for systematic errors in the current ICRF version.

preprint2009arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.